← Tutti gli studi Farmacologia

Cardiovascular Outcomes with Tirzepatide versus Dulaglutide in Type 2 Diabetes.

Nicholls SJ, et al. · 2025
PubMed 41406444 ↗DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2505928The New England journal of medicine
🌱 La lettura di LEO
🛡️ Lavora su: Protezione d'organo · lente Traiettoria · il corpo nel tempo
tocca anche 💊 Terapia
RCT (prova forte)
La domanda

Nel diabete tipo 2 con malattia cardiovascolare aterosclerotica, tirzepatide è sicuro sul piano cardiovascolare rispetto a dulaglutide?

Cosa hanno trovato

RCT in doppio cieco di non inferiorità, comparatore attivo dulaglutide (agente già dimostrato ridurre gli eventi CV). 13.299 randomizzati; popolazione mITT 6586 (tirzepatide) vs 6579 (dulaglutide). Età media 64,1±8,8 anni, 29,0% donne, BMI 32,6±5,5, HbA1c 8,4±0,9%, durata diabete 14,7±8,8 anni. Endpoint primario composito (morte CV, IMA o ictus): 801 eventi (12,2%) vs 862 (13,1%); HR 0,92 (IC 95,3% 0,83-1,01); P=0,003 per non inferiorità, P=0,09 per superiorità. Eventi avversi simili, ma più eventi gastrointestinali con tirzepatide. (SURPASS-CVOT).

Cosa significa per te

Nel tipo 2 ad alto rischio cardiovascolare, tirzepatide risulta non peggiore di dulaglutide sugli eventi cardiovascolari maggiori; la superiorità NON è stata raggiunta (P=0,09). Il messaggio è rassicurante sulla sicurezza cardiovascolare, non la prova di un vantaggio CV aggiuntivo. Non applicabile al tipo 1. La scelta terapeutica resta del diabetologo.

Abstract (in lingua originale)

BACKGROUND: Tirzepatide, a dual incretin agonist of the glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptors, has favorable effects on glycemic control and body weight. The effects on cardiovascular outcomes are uncertain. METHODS: We conducted an active-comparator-controlled, double-blind, noninferiority trial in which patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a weekly subcutaneous injection of tirzepatide (up to 15 mg) or dulaglutide (1.5 mg), an agent that has been shown to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke and was tested for noninferiority of tirzepatide to dulaglutide with a margin of 1.05 for the upper limit of the 95.3% confidence interval for the hazard ratio. An upper limit of less than 1.00 was considered to indicate superiority of tirzepatide to dulaglutide. RESULTS: A total of 13,299 patients underwent randomization; 134 were subsequently excluded because they did not meet inclusion criteria. The modified intention-to-treat population thus included 6586 patients in the tirzepatide group and 6579 in the dulaglutide group. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 64.1±8.8 years, 29.0% were women, the mean body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 32.6±5.5, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was 8.4±0.9%, and the mean duration of diabetes was 14.7±8.8 years. A primary end-point event occurred in 801 patients (12.2%) in the tirzepatide group and 862 (13.1%) in the dulaglutide group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95.3% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.01; P = 0.003 for noninferiority; P = 0.09 for superiority). The incidence of adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups, although more gastrointestinal adverse events were observed in the tirzepatide group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, tirzepatide was noninferior to dulaglutide with respect to a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. (Funded by Eli Lilly; SURPASS-CVOT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04255433.).
💬 Chiedi a LEO di spiegartelo
Come leggerlo: è uno studio scientifico peer-reviewed. Le evidenze aiutano a capire i trend, ma un singolo studio non è una prescrizione: parlane col tuo diabetologo prima di cambiare dieta o terapia.