Effect of steviol glycosides as natural sweeteners on glucose metabolism in adult participants.
Bai X, et al. · 2024
🌱 La lettura di LEO
⚓ Conferma: Peso del cibo · nella formula Vitalità
Meta-analisi di 12 RCT (871 persone) — qualita' complessiva dell'evidenza valutata BASSA
La domanda
La seconda meta-analisi sulla stevia conferma la prima?
Cosa hanno trovato
Si', con numeri simili: glicemia a digiuno −4,10 mg/dL, HbA1c invariata (+0,01%). L'effetto favorevole si concentrava in chi aveva meno di 50 anni, in chi NON aveva diabete o ipertensione, e nelle persone in sovrappeso o obese.
Cosa significa per te
Due meta-analisi indipendenti che dicono la stessa cosa piccola: un paio di mg/dL in meno a digiuno, niente sull'HbA1c. Il dato scomodo per noi: il beneficio si vedeva soprattutto in chi il diabete NON ce l'ha.
Abstract (in lingua originale)
Steviol glycosides (SGs) are recognized as safe natural sweeteners; however, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed an inconclusive effect of SGs on glucose metabolism in adult participants. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to assess the effect of SGs on glucose metabolism. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE to include eligible RCTs. Our primary outcomes were differences between SGs and the control group with respect to changes in blood glucose from the baseline to the end of intervention (including fasting blood glucose [FBG], and HbA1c measurements). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for data synthesis to calculate the pooled mean difference (MD). There were twelve RCTs included for analyses with a total of 871 participants (48% females). A significant effect of SGs on FBG (MD = -4.10 mg dl-1, 95% CI -6.55 to -1.65) was found, while no significant difference in HbA1c (MD = 0.01%, 95% CI -0.12% to 0.13%) was observed between SGs and controls. The whole quality of evidence was rated as low. Subgroup analyses demonstrated favorable effects of SGs on FBG in participants aged ≤50 years, those without diabetes mellitus (DM) or hypertension at the baseline, and overweight and obese adults. Sensitivity analyses yielded results largely similar to the main findings. To conclude, SGs are found to produce significant improvement in glucose metabolism in adult participants when compared with the control. More evidence is required to further clarify and support the benefit of SGs as a sugar substitute for glucose metabolism.
💬 Chiedi a LEO di spiegartelo
Come leggerlo: è uno studio scientifico peer-reviewed. Le evidenze aiutano a capire i trend, ma un singolo studio non è una prescrizione: parlane col tuo diabetologo prima di cambiare dieta o terapia.