← Tutti gli studi Remissione del tipo 2

Metabolic surgery versus conventional medical therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: 10-year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial.

Mingrone G, et al. · 2021
PubMed 33485454 ↗DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32649-0Lancet (London, England)
🌱 La lettura di LEO
⚖️ Lavora su: Peso & grasso viscerale · lente Traiettoria · il corpo nel tempo
tocca anche 🛡️ Protezione d'organo💊 Terapia
RCT (prova forte per il disegno; monocentrico e campione piccolo, follow-up 10 anni)
La domanda

A 10 anni, la chirurgia metabolica controlla il diabete tipo 2 meglio della terapia medica convenzionale?

Cosa hanno trovato

RCT open-label monocentrico su 60 pazienti (T2 di durata >5 anni, HbA1c >7%, BMI ≥35), randomizzati 1:1:1 a terapia medica, bypass gastrico Roux-en-Y (RYGB) o diversione biliopancreatica (BPD). Follow-up a 10 anni del 95% (57/60). Il 37,5% degli operati ha mantenuto la remissione per tutti i 10 anni. Tassi di remissione a 10 anni (intention-to-treat): 5,5% terapia medica (IC 95% 1,0-25,7), 50,0% BPD (IC 95% 29,9-70,1), 25,0% RYGB (IC 95% 11,2-46,9); p=0,0082. Tra chi era in remissione a 2 anni, il 58,8% (20/34) ha avuto recidiva di iperglicemia (BPD 52,6%, RYGB 66,7%), ma tutti mantenevano un buon controllo a 10 anni (HbA1c media 6,7%, SD 0,2). Meno complicanze diabetiche nei gruppi chirurgici (rischio relativo 0,07; IC 95% 0,01-0,48). Eventi avversi seri più frequenti con BPD (OR vs terapia medica 2,7; IC 95% 1,3-5,6), non con RYGB (OR 0,7; IC 95% 0,3-1,9).

Cosa significa per te

Nel tipo 2 con obesità la chirurgia metabolica dà una remissione molto più duratura e meno complicanze rispetto alla sola terapia medica; molte remissioni recidivano nel tempo ma il controllo glicemico resta comunque buono. La BPD è la più efficace ma comporta più eventi avversi seri: il bilancio beneficio/rischio e la scelta della procedura sono decisioni dello specialista. Limiti: studio monocentrico e campione piccolo (60 pazienti). Riguarda il tipo 2, non il tipo 1 autoimmune.

Abstract (in lingua originale)

BACKGROUND: No data from randomised controlled trials of metabolic surgery for diabetes are available beyond 5 years of follow-up. We aimed to assess 10-year follow-up after surgery compared with medical therapy for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We did a 10-year follow-up study of an open-label, single-centre (tertiary hospital in Rome, Italy), randomised controlled trial, in which patients with type 2 diabetes (baseline duration >5 years; glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] >7·0%, and body-mass index ≥35 kg/m2) were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to medical therapy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) by a computerised system. The primary endpoint of the study was diabetes remission at 2 years (HbA1c <6·5% and fasting glycaemia <5·55 mmol/L without ongoing medication for at least 1 year). In the 10-year analysis, durability of diabetes remission was analysed by intention to treat (ITT). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00888836. FINDINGS: Between April 30, 2009, and Oct 31, 2011, of 72 patients assessed for eligibility, 60 were included. The 10-year follow-up rate was 95·0% (57 of 60). Of all patients who were surgically treated, 15 (37·5%) maintained diabetes remission throughout the 10-year period. Specifically, 10-year remission rates in the ITT population were 5·5% for medical therapy (95% CI 1·0-25·7; one participant went into remission after crossover to surgery), 50·0% for BPD (29·9-70·1), and 25·0% for RYGB (11·2-46·9; p=0·0082). 20 (58·8%) of 34 participants who were observed to be in remission at 2 years had a relapse of hyperglycaemia during the follow-up period (BPD 52·6% [95% CI 31·7-72·7]; RYGB 66·7% [41·7-84·8]). All individuals with relapse, however, maintained adequate glycaemic control at 10 years (mean HbA1c 6·7% [SD 0·2]). Participants in the RYGB and BPD groups had fewer diabetes-related complications than those in the medical therapy group (relative risk 0·07 [95% CI 0·01-0·48] for both comparisons). Serious adverse events occurred more frequently among participants in the BPD group (odds ratio [OR] for BPD vs medical therapy 2·7 [95% CI 1·3-5·6]; OR for RYGB vs medical therapy 0·7 [0·3-1·9]). INTERPRETATION: Metabolic surgery is more effective than conventional medical therapy in the long-term control of type 2 diabetes. Clinicians and policy makers should ensure that metabolic surgery is appropriately considered in the management of patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes. FUNDING: Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS.
💬 Chiedi a LEO di spiegartelo
Come leggerlo: è uno studio scientifico peer-reviewed. Le evidenze aiutano a capire i trend, ma un singolo studio non è una prescrizione: parlane col tuo diabetologo prima di cambiare dieta o terapia.