← Tutti gli studi
Farmacologia
Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy.
Perkovic V, et al. · 2019
🌱 La lettura di LEO
🛡️ Lavora su: Protezione d'organo · lente Traiettoria · il corpo nel tempo
tocca anche 💊 Terapia
RCT (prova forte)
La domandaIn pazienti con diabete tipo 2 e nefropatia albuminurica, canagliflozin riduce la progressione verso l'insufficienza renale e gli eventi cardiovascolari?
Cosa hanno trovatoRCT in doppio cieco, n=4401 (diabete tipo 2, eGFR 30-<90, albumina/creatinina >300-5000, tutti in terapia con blocco del sistema renina-angiotensina); interrotto in anticipo dopo analisi interim, follow-up mediano 2,62 anni. Outcome primario composito (malattia renale terminale, raddoppio creatinina, morte renale o CV): 43,2 vs 61,2 eventi/1000 anni-paziente; HR 0,70 (IC 95% 0,59-0,82; P=0,00001), rischio relativo -30%. Composito renale-specifico: HR 0,66 (0,53-0,81; P<0,001), -34%. Malattia renale terminale: HR 0,68 (0,54-0,86; P=0,002), -32%. Morte CV/IM/ictus: HR 0,80 (0,67-0,95; P=0,01). Ospedalizzazione per scompenso: HR 0,61 (0,47-0,80; P<0,001). Nessuna differenza significativa in amputazioni o fratture.
Cosa significa per teNel diabete tipo 2 con danno renale gia presente e albuminuria, questo SGLT2 inibitore (aggiunto al farmaco 'protettivo del rene' gia in uso) ha ridotto di circa un terzo la progressione verso la dialisi e abbassato eventi cardiaci. Prova forte (RCT ampio interrotto per efficacia). E protezione d'organo, non gestione della glicemia quotidiana: la prescrizione la decide il diabetologo/nefrologo. Non applicabile al diabete tipo 1.
Abstract (in lingua originale)
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of kidney failure worldwide, but few effective long-term treatments are available. In cardiovascular trials of inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease to receive canagliflozin, an oral SGLT2 inhibitor, at a dose of 100 mg daily or placebo. All the patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 30 to <90 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area and albuminuria (ratio of albumin [mg] to creatinine [g], >300 to 5000) and were treated with renin-angiotensin system blockade. The primary outcome was a composite of end-stage kidney disease (dialysis, transplantation, or a sustained estimated GFR of <15 ml per minute per 1.73 m2), a doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes. Prespecified secondary outcomes were tested hierarchically. RESULTS: The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee. At that time, 4401 patients had undergone randomization, with a median follow-up of 2.62 years. The relative risk of the primary outcome was 30% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group, with event rates of 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.82; P = 0.00001). The relative risk of the renal-specific composite of end-stage kidney disease, a doubling of the creatinine level, or death from renal causes was lower by 34% (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P<0.001), and the relative risk of end-stage kidney disease was lower by 32% (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P = 0.002). The canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; P = 0.01) and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of amputation or fracture. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, the risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular events was lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 2.62 years. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; CREDENCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02065791.).
💬 Chiedi a LEO di spiegartelo
Come leggerlo: è uno studio scientifico peer-reviewed. Le evidenze aiutano a capire i trend, ma un singolo studio non è una prescrizione: parlane col tuo diabetologo prima di cambiare dieta o terapia.