← Tutti gli studi
Farmacologia
Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
Wiviott SD, et al. · 2019
🌱 La lettura di LEO
🛡️ Lavora su: Protezione d'organo · lente Traiettoria · il corpo nel tempo
tocca anche 💊 Terapia
RCT (prova forte)
La domandaIn pazienti con diabete tipo 2 con malattia cardiovascolare aterosclerotica o a rischio, dapagliflozin e sicuro dal punto di vista cardiovascolare e ne migliora gli esiti?
Cosa hanno trovatoRCT, n=17.160 (di cui 10.186 senza malattia CV aterosclerotica), follow-up mediano 4,2 anni. MACE (morte CV, infarto, ictus ischemico): raggiunta la non-inferiorita vs placebo (limite superiore IC 95% <1,3; P<0,001 per non-inferiorita); MACE 8,8% vs 9,4%; HR 0,93 (0,84-1,03; P=0,17): NON ridotto. Morte CV o ospedalizzazione per scompenso: 4,9% vs 5,8%; HR 0,83 (0,73-0,95; P=0,005), trainato dai ricoveri per scompenso HR 0,73 (0,61-0,88); morte CV HR 0,98 (0,82-1,17), nessuna differenza. Evento renale: 4,3% vs 5,6%; HR 0,76 (0,67-0,87). Mortalita totale 6,2% vs 6,6%; HR 0,93 (0,82-1,04). Chetoacidosi diabetica piu frequente: 0,3% vs 0,1% (P=0,02); infezioni genitali serie/con sospensione 0,9% vs 0,1% (P<0,001).
Cosa significa per teNel diabete tipo 2, questo SGLT2 inibitore non ha ridotto gli infarti/ictus (MACE) ma ha ridotto i ricoveri per scompenso cardiaco e gli eventi renali, restando cardio-sicuro. Attenzione ai due segnali di rischio emersi: chetoacidosi (rara ma piu frequente) e infezioni genitali. Prova forte (RCT molto ampio) ma il beneficio e su scompenso/rene, non su infarto e mortalita. Nel tipo 1 il rischio di chetoacidosi con questa classe e una preoccupazione nota: qualsiasi terapia e decisione del diabetologo.
Abstract (in lingua originale)
BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular safety profile of dapagliflozin, a selective inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 that promotes glucosuria in patients with type 2 diabetes, is undefined. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes who had or were at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease to receive either dapagliflozin or placebo. The primary safety outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke. The primary efficacy outcomes were MACE and a composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary efficacy outcomes were a renal composite (≥40% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate to <60 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area, new end-stage renal disease, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes) and death from any cause. RESULTS: We evaluated 17,160 patients, including 10,186 without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, who were followed for a median of 4.2 years. In the primary safety outcome analysis, dapagliflozin met the prespecified criterion for noninferiority to placebo with respect to MACE (upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval [CI], <1.3; P<0.001 for noninferiority). In the two primary efficacy analyses, dapagliflozin did not result in a lower rate of MACE (8.8% in the dapagliflozin group and 9.4% in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.03; P=0.17) but did result in a lower rate of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (4.9% vs. 5.8%; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.95; P=0.005), which reflected a lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.88); there was no between-group difference in cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.17). A renal event occurred in 4.3% in the dapagliflozin group and in 5.6% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.87), and death from any cause occurred in 6.2% and 6.6%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.04). Diabetic ketoacidosis was more common with dapagliflozin than with placebo (0.3% vs. 0.1%, P=0.02), as was the rate of genital infections that led to discontinuation of the regimen or that were considered to be serious adverse events (0.9% vs. 0.1%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes who had or were at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, treatment with dapagliflozin did not result in a higher or lower rate of MACE than placebo but did result in a lower rate of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, a finding that reflects a lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure. (Funded by AstraZeneca; DECLARE-TIMI 58 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01730534 .).
💬 Chiedi a LEO di spiegartelo
Come leggerlo: è uno studio scientifico peer-reviewed. Le evidenze aiutano a capire i trend, ma un singolo studio non è una prescrizione: parlane col tuo diabetologo prima di cambiare dieta o terapia.