← Tutti gli studi Microbiota intestinale

Probiotics for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Samah S, et al. · 2016
PubMed 27388674 ↗DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.06.014Diabetes research and clinical practice
🌱 La lettura di LEO
📉 Lavora su: Stabilità nel tempo · lente Traiettoria · il corpo nel tempo
Meta-analisi di 5 RCT su 6 (campione ridotto; rischio di bias basso o non chiaro) — risultato parzialmente NEGATIVO
La domanda

La stima storica: cosa si sapeva dei probiotici nel 2016?

Cosa hanno trovato

Glicemia a digiuno significativamente piu' bassa coi probiotici (−0,98 mmol/L, circa −18 mg/dL). Ma HbA1c e tutti gli esiti secondari (insulina, HOMA-IR, PCR, interleuchina-6) NON sono cambiati in modo significativo. Gli autori concludono chiedendo studi meglio disegnati.

Cosa significa per te

Sta qui apposta come contrappeso storico: otto anni e trenta trial dopo, la stima non e' cambiata granche'. Un effetto modesto, reale sulla glicemia a digiuno, incerto sul resto.

Abstract (in lingua originale)

AIMS: To systematically review evidence of probiotic interventions against type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and analyse the effects of probiotics on glycaemic control among T2DM patients. METHODS: Electronic search using five electronic databases was performed until October 2015. Relevant studies were identified, extracted and assessed for risk of bias. The primary outcomes of this review were glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting blood glucose (FBG). Fasting plasma insulin, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and malondialdehyde, were identified as the secondary outcomes. Mean differences (MD) between probiotics and control groups for all outcomes were pooled using either Fixed- or Random-Effect Model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using I(2) and Chi(2) tests. RESULTS: Six randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the systematic review, whereas only five were included in meta-analysis. Most RCTs were presented with low or unclear risk of bias. When compared to placebo, FBG was significantly lower with probiotic consumption (MD=-0.98mmol/L; 95% CI: -1.17, 0.78, p<0.00001), with moderate but insignificant heterogeneity noted. Insignificant changes between the groups were also noted for HbA1c and other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A moderate hypoglycaemic effect of probiotics, with a significantly lower FBG was noted. Findings on HbA1c, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects of probiotics in the clinical setting, however, remain inconsistent. The findings imply the need for well-designed clinical studies to further assess the potential beneficial effects of probiotics in management of T2DM.
💬 Chiedi a LEO di spiegartelo
Come leggerlo: è uno studio scientifico peer-reviewed. Le evidenze aiutano a capire i trend, ma un singolo studio non è una prescrizione: parlane col tuo diabetologo prima di cambiare dieta o terapia.