A randomized controlled trial contrasting the effects of 4 low-calorie sweeteners and sucrose on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity.
Higgins KA, et al. · 2019
🌱 La lettura di LEO
⚓ Conferma: Peso del cibo · nella formula Vitalità
RCT a bracci paralleli, 12 settimane, 154 randomizzati e 123 completati, in adulti con sovrappeso o obesita' — il confronto DIRETTO fra quattro dolcificanti, che quasi nessuno ha fatto
La domanda
Se proprio devo sceglierne uno, cambia qualcosa quale scelgo?
Cosa hanno trovato
Si'. Con saccarosio (+1,85 kg) e con SACCARINA (+1,18 kg) il peso e' aumentato in 12 settimane, e i due non differivano fra loro. Con aspartame, sucralosio e rebaudioside A (stevia) nessun aumento significativo; per il sucralosio la variazione era negativa.
Cosa significa per te
Il risultato piu' pratico dell'intero asse: i dolcificanti non sono una categoria unica. La saccarina ha fatto ingrassare quanto lo zucchero. Se si sceglie di usarli, questa e' l'informazione che serve — ed e' l'unico studio qui dentro che la da'.
Abstract (in lingua originale)
BACKGROUND: Low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) provide sweetness with little or no energy. However, each LCS's unique chemical structure has potential to elicit different sensory, physiological, and behavioral responses that affect body weight. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this trial was to compare the effects of consumption of 4 LCSs and sucrose on body weight, ingestive behaviors, and glucose tolerance over a 12-wk intervention in adults (18-60 y old) with overweight or obesity (body mass index 25-40 kg/m2). METHODS: In a parallel-arm design, 154 participants were randomly assigned to consume 1.25-1.75 L of beverage sweetened with sucrose (n = 39), aspartame (n = 30), saccharin (n = 29), sucralose (n = 28), or rebaudioside A (rebA) (n = 28) daily for 12 wk. The beverages contained 400-560 kcal/d (sucrose treatments) or <5 kcal/d (LCS treatments). Anthropometric indexes, energy intake, energy expenditure, appetite, and glucose tolerance were measured at baseline. Body weight was measured every 2 wk with energy intake, expenditure, and appetite assessed every 4 wk. Twenty-four-hour urine collections were completed every 4 wk to determine study compliance via para-aminobenzoic acid excretion. RESULTS: Of the participants enrolled in the trial, 123 completed the 12-wk intervention. Sucrose and saccharin consumption led to increased body weight across the 12-wk intervention (Δweight = +1.85 ± 0.36 kg and +1.18 ± 0.36 kg, respectively; P ≤ 0.02) and did not differ from each other. There was no significant change in body weight with consumption of the other LCS treatments compared with baseline, but change in body weight for sucralose was negative and significantly lower compared with all other LCSs at week 12 (weight difference ≥ 1.37 ± 0.52 kg, P ≤ 0.008). Energy intake decreased with sucralose consumption (P = 0.02) and ingestive frequency was lower for sucralose than for saccharin (P = 0.045). Glucose tolerance was not significantly affected by any of the sweetener treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Sucrose and saccharin consumption significantly increase body weight compared with aspartame, rebA, and sucralose, whereas weight change was directionally negative and lower for sucralose compared with saccharin, aspartame, and rebA consumption. LCSs should be categorized as distinct entities because of their differing effects on body weight. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02928653.
💬 Chiedi a LEO di spiegartelo
Come leggerlo: è uno studio scientifico peer-reviewed. Le evidenze aiutano a capire i trend, ma un singolo studio non è una prescrizione: parlane col tuo diabetologo prima di cambiare dieta o terapia.